Situation

When I can't stop thinking about what might happen

5 traditions are shelved here, each stating the question in its own words.

Whose job is it to provide what I need?

A tradition rooted in the Hebrew scriptures and in the life and teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, carried through two millennia of churches, commentaries, liturgies and practices. Its texts are read as scripture by their communities.

Therefore I tell you, don't be anxious for your life: what you will eat, or what you will drink; nor yet for your body, what you will wear. Isn't life more than food, and the body more than clothing? See the birds of the sky, that they don't sow, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns. Your heavenly Father feeds them. Aren't you of much more value than they?

"Which of you, by being anxious, can add one moment to his lifespan? Why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow. They don't toil, neither do they spin, yet I tell you that even Solomon in all his glory was not dressed like one of these. But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today exists, and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, won't he much more clothe you, you of little faith?

"Therefore don't be anxious, saying, 'What will we eat?', 'What will we drink?' or, 'With what will we be clothed?' For the Gentiles seek after all these things; for your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. But seek first God's Kingdom, and his righteousness; and all these things will be given to you as well.

Therefore don't be anxious for tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Each day's own evil is sufficient.

The Holy Bible, World English Bible. Public domain. The WEB is a revision of the American Standard Version of 1901.

About this passageAn excerpt from the Sermon on the Mount, a long block of teaching in Matthew's gospel. The section immediately before it contrasts two objects of devotion, and this passage follows from that with the word "therefore" — the argument is that anxiety about provision follows from where a person has placed their trust. The examples are deliberately ordinary: birds that do not farm, wildflowers that outdress a king, the day's own trouble.

Filed underanxietyprovisiontrustfuture

Is this within my power, or outside it?

A school of Greek and Roman philosophy taught from the third century BCE onward, concerned with judgement, action and the distinction between what a person controls and what they do not. Its surviving handbooks were written as practical training rather than theory.

There are things which are within our power, and there are things which are beyond our power. Within our power are opinion, aim, desire, aversion, and, in one word, whatever affairs are our own. Beyond our power are body, property, reputation, office, and, in one word, whatever are not properly our own affairs.

Aiming, therefore, at such great things, remember that you must not allow yourself any inclination, however slight, toward the attainment of the others; but that you must entirely quit some of them, and for the present postpone the rest.

Seek at once, therefore, to be able to say to every unpleasing semblance, "You are but a semblance and by no means the real thing." And then examine it by those rules which you have; and first and chiefly by this: whether it concerns the things which are within our own power or those which are not; and if it concerns anything beyond our power, be prepared to say that it is nothing to you.

Epictetus, The Enchiridion, translated by Thomas Wentworth Higginson. Public domain.

About this passageThe opening chapter of the handbook, and the division everything else in it rests on. Epictetus sorts the whole of experience into two piles and puts body, property and reputation firmly in the second. The final paragraph gives the practical drill: meet each impression as it arrives, test which pile it belongs to, and if it belongs to the second, say so.

Filed underanxietycontroljudgementfuture

Am I asking for something no one has ever been granted?

A tradition originating with the teaching of the Buddha in northern India and preserved in several textual collections. The discourses gathered here come from the Pali canon, recorded as talks given to particular people in particular circumstances.

"Mendicants, there are five things that cannot be had by any ascetic or brahmin or god or Māra or divinity or by anyone in the world. What five?

That someone liable to old age should not grow old. That someone liable to sickness should not get sick. That someone liable to death should not die. That someone liable to ending should not end. That someone liable to perishing should not perish.

An unlearned ordinary person has someone liable to old age who grows old. But they don't reflect on old age: 'It's not just me who has someone liable to old age who grows old. For as long as sentient beings come and go, pass away and are reborn, they all have someone liable to old age who grows old. If I were to sorrow and wail and lament, beating my breast and falling into confusion, just because someone liable to old age grows old, I'd lose my appetite and my physical appearance would deteriorate. My work wouldn't get done, my enemies would be encouraged, and my friends would be dispirited.'

And so, when someone liable to old age grows old, they sorrow and wail and lament, beating their breast and falling into confusion. This is called an unlearned ordinary person struck by sorrow's poisoned arrow, who only mortifies themselves."

Translated by Bhikkhu Sujato, published by SuttaCentral and dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0.

About this passageA discourse listing five facts that no one — however powerful, human or divine — can arrange otherwise. The text then draws a distinction not between people who suffer loss and people who don't, but between those who have reflected on its universality beforehand and those who have not. The repeated phrase "it's not just me" is the hinge of the argument. In the full discourse this teaching is given to a king whose queen has died.

Filed underanxietyimpermanenceacceptancegrieffuture

Is there an action here, or am I only rehearsing?

Reflection that does not appeal to a religious or philosophical authority. The pieces here were written for this collection and make no claim to be anything other than one way of putting a question.

Worry feels like preparation. That is the trick of it.

Running the bad outcome again tonight will not make you readier for it than running it once did, and you have already run it once. The fourteenth rehearsal is not planning. It is the mind mistaking motion for progress, because sitting still with an unanswered question is harder than pacing.

A test worth applying: is there an action? If there is — a call to make, a number to check, a bag to pack — the worry has done its job, and you can thank it and go do the thing. If there isn't, then nothing further is being accomplished, and the only question left is what you would like to do with the hours between now and knowing.

Most of what we fear arrives differently than rehearsed, or not at all. Neither of those is a reason to stop caring. It is only a reason to stop paying tomorrow's price twice.

Written for this collection.

About this passageWritten for this collection. It describes a habit rather than prescribing a cure, and assumes no belief on the reader's part.

Filed underanxietyfutureattention

What is already in motion, and what is mine to time?

A practice of reading meaning from the positions of the sun, moon and planets, attested in Babylonian, Hellenistic, Indian and Chinese forms and continuous in the West since antiquity. Western astrology divides the year into twelve signs and reads the movement of the planets as a description of timing, season and disposition.

Mercury turns retrograde three or four times a year, and for about three weeks the sky suggests review rather than launch.

The traditional advice is narrow and practical: this is a period for the re-words. Revisit, reconsider, revise, reread the contract, return the call you let go. It is not a warning that the worst will happen. It is a statement about what kind of work the moment is suited to, which is a different claim altogether.

Underneath it sits the older idea that timing is real — that a beginning has a character given by the moment it is begun in, and that some hours are better suited to setting out than others. An astrologer asked to elect a date does not ask whether you are ready. They ask what the sky is doing, and then they wait for a better window.

Which is worth borrowing on the nights when the mind runs the same scenario for the fourteenth time. Some of what is coming is already in motion and is not yours to hurry. What is yours is the choice of when to move, and that choice keeps until the window opens.

Written for this collection in the idiom of a modern astrological column.

About this passageA planet is "retrograde" when, seen from Earth, it appears to move backward against the stars; Mercury does this three or four times a year for about three weeks. Electional astrology is the branch concerned with choosing when to begin something, and it treats timing as a property of the moment rather than of the person acting.

Filed underanxietyfuturepatiencetime

Back to the catalog