Situation

When someone has wronged me

5 traditions are shelved here, each stating the question in its own words.

What happens to hatred if I put it down?

A tradition originating with the teaching of the Buddha in northern India and preserved in several textual collections. The discourses gathered here come from the Pali canon, recorded as talks given to particular people in particular circumstances.

"They abused me, they hit me! They beat me, they robbed me!" For those who bear such a grudge, hatred is never laid to rest.

"They abused me, they hit me! They beat me, they robbed me!" For those who bear no such grudge, hatred is laid to rest.

For never is hatred laid to rest by hate, it's laid to rest by love: this is an ancient teaching.

When others do not understand, let us, who do understand this, restrain ourselves in this regard; for that is how conflicts are laid to rest.

Translated by Bhikkhu Sujato, published by SuttaCentral and dedicated to the public domain under CC0 1.0.

About this passageFour verses from the opening chapter of the Dhammapada, titled "Pairs" because its verses come in matched sets showing a thing and its opposite. Verses 3 and 4 are such a pair, identical except for one word. The list of grievances is deliberately concrete and repeated verbatim, so that the only variable left is whether it is carried. Verse 5 calls the teaching ancient, presenting it as something restated rather than newly discovered.

Filed underloveforgivenessenemiesresentmentcompassion

What is the account for, and who is paying?

Reflection that does not appeal to a religious or philosophical authority. The pieces here were written for this collection and make no claim to be anything other than one way of putting a question.

There is an account open in your name, and you are the only one making entries in it.

That is the strange part. The person who wronged you has, in all likelihood, stopped thinking about it. They have a version of the story in which they were tired, or provoked, or right. You have the ledger, and you update it, and every update costs you an evening.

None of which makes the wrong less real. Some things genuinely were unfair, and saying so out loud matters. The question is narrower than justice: what is the account for? If it is evidence, it is already gathered. If it is a warning about who to trust, you have learned that, and you can act on it without rereading the file.

Closing an account is not the same as saying the debt was never owed. It is deciding who goes on paying the interest.

Written for this collection.

About this passageWritten for this collection. It is one way of putting the question and makes no claim about what anyone owes anyone.

Filed underloveforgivenessresentmentenemies

What is this conflict asking me to learn right now?

A practice of reading meaning from the positions of the sun, moon and planets, attested in Babylonian, Hellenistic, Indian and Chinese forms and continuous in the West since antiquity. Western astrology divides the year into twelve signs and reads the movement of the planets as a description of timing, season and disposition.

An opposition is not a wound. It is a sightline.

Two planets a hundred and eighty degrees apart can only see each other, and the tradition reads that geometry as a subject a person keeps meeting through other people. What sits across the chart from you tends to arrive wearing someone else's face. The argument is real, the other person is real, and the axis is still an axis.

Mars is the planet of the flare — the heat that gets you out of a chair and into the argument. It is not treated as a fault to be corrected. Mars is how anything gets defended, and a chart without it would be a chart of someone who never stood up. But Mars unaimed simply burns whatever is nearest, and the classical remedy is not to cool it. It is to give it a direction.

The Aries–Libra axis is the one that runs between having a self and having a relationship, and nobody resolves it permanently. It comes round again. What changes, across enough passes, is how quickly you recognise it when it does.

Written for this collection in the idiom of a modern astrological column.

About this passageAn "opposition" is an aspect formed when two planets sit on opposite sides of the chart, a hundred and eighty degrees apart. Mars is the traditional ruler of Aries and, in classical astrology, of conflict, appetite and the will to act. The Aries–Libra axis pairs the sign of self-assertion with the sign of relationship and balance.

Filed underloveforgivenessenemiesresentmentconflict

Can I love someone who has not earned it?

A tradition rooted in the Hebrew scriptures and in the life and teaching of Jesus of Nazareth, carried through two millennia of churches, commentaries, liturgies and practices. Its texts are read as scripture by their communities.

"You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who mistreat you and persecute you, that you may be children of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the just and the unjust.

For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Don't even the tax collectors do the same? If you only greet your friends, what more do you do than others? Don't even the tax collectors do the same? Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect."

The Holy Bible, World English Bible. Public domain. The WEB is a revision of the American Standard Version of 1901.

About this passageThe last of a series in the Sermon on the Mount in which Jesus quotes a received teaching and then extends it — "you have heard that it was said … but I tell you". The argument turns on the weather: sun and rain fall on everyone regardless of merit, and the listener is told to love on the same terms. The closing word translated "perfect" carries the sense of complete or brought to its full end, rather than flawless.

Filed underloveforgivenessenemiescompassion

What did this look like from inside their head?

A school of Greek and Roman philosophy taught from the third century BCE onward, concerned with judgement, action and the distinction between what a person controls and what they do not. Its surviving handbooks were written as practical training rather than theory.

When any person does ill by you, or speaks ill of you, remember that he acts or speaks from an impression that it is right for him to do so. Now it is not possible that he should follow what appears right to you, but only what appears so to himself. Therefore, if he judges from false appearances, he is the person hurt, since he, too, is the person deceived. For if anyone takes a true proposition to be false, the proposition is not hurt, but only the man is deceived. Setting out, then, from these principles, you will meekly bear with a person who reviles you, for you will say upon every occasion, "It seemed so to him."

Epictetus, The Enchiridion, translated by Thomas Wentworth Higginson. Public domain.

About this passageA short chapter on being wronged. Epictetus applies the school's account of judgement to the person who has done the harm: they acted on how things appeared to them, and a person cannot act on an appearance they do not have. The argument concludes that the one holding a false view is the one damaged by it. The chapter ends with a phrase offered as something to actually say under one's breath at the time.

Filed underloveforgivenessenemiesjudgementresentment

Back to the catalog